Home › Brokers › Best brokers for US retirement accounts
IRA and 401(k) rollovers are a US-resident question, and the deciding factor is fund selection and cost, not trading tools.
Answer: 5 of the brokers we cover meet the criteria for this page. Ordered on those criteria, Charles Schwab is the first name to look at — US residents.
Real share ownership from almost any country
Open account| Broker | What you get | Minimum |
|---|---|---|
| Charles Schwab | Share ownership | None |
| Fidelity | Share ownership | None |
| Interactive Brokers | Share ownership | None |
| Merrill Edge | Share ownership | None |
| Vanguard | Share ownership | None |
A full-service US brokerage; thinkorswim gives it a genuinely strong active-trading platform.
Strongest on the long-term-investor side: research, cash management and low-cost index funds.
The default answer for a non-US investor who wants to actually own US shares rather than a derivative of them.
The reason to choose it is the banking relationship, not the trading platform.
Built for people who want to stop looking at the screen, not for traders.
Charles Schwab leads this list on our criteria: IRA account types supported. A full-service US brokerage; thinkorswim gives it a genuinely strong active-trading platform.
No. A contract for difference tracks the share price but confers no ownership, no voting rights and no real dividend — only a cash adjustment. It is a leveraged trading product, not an investment holding.
By the criteria named on this page, using each broker's own published data. Commercial relationships never move a broker up a data-ordered table; where two brokers are genuinely equal on the criteria, our partners appear first and are labelled as partners.
Every fee statement links to the broker's own pricing page, which is the authoritative source. We restate published figures rather than estimating them, and where a broker does not publish a number we print "not published".
Reviewed August 2026 · sources linked on each broker profile.