Home › Compare › Pepperstone vs Trading 212
Pepperstone vs Trading 212 for US stocks
Trading 212 gives you the actual share; Pepperstone gives leveraged exposure to the price without ownership. That is not a preference — it is a different product, with different tax, dividend and risk treatment.
Pick Pepperstone if non-US residents trading US shares as CFDs. Pick Trading 212 if european investors.
A CFD and spread-betting broker, not a US stockbroker. It is on this site because for most non-US traders it is one of the few regulated routes to US-share exposure with leverage.
Visit PepperstoneThe FX conversion charge, not commission, is where the cost of a US trade actually sits.
Visit Trading 212Side by side
| Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|
| What you hold | A CFD on the price | The share |
| US stock access | 1,000+ US share CFDs | US listed stocks and ETFs plus share CFDs |
| Minimum deposit | None | $1 |
| Fractional shares | n/a | Yes |
| Published pricing | US share CFDs are commission-based on the Razor account and spread-based on Standard; overnight financing applies to positions held past the close. | No commission on real stock investing; an FX conversion fee applies to non-base-currency trades. |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView | Trading 212 web, Trading 212 mobile |
| Extended hours | Selected US share CFDs only — check the instrument schedule | Not offered on real-stock orders |
| Regulation | FCA 684312, ASIC 414530, CySEC 388/20, DFSA F004356, BaFin 151148 | FCA 609146, CySEC 398/21 |
| Founded | 2010 | 2004 |
Where each one wins
Pepperstone
- Non-US residents trading US shares as CFDs
- Leveraged short-term positions
- MetaTrader and TradingView users
- CFDs are leveraged: you do not own the share, get no shareholder rights, and can lose more than you expect
- Not available to US residents
Trading 212
- European investors
- Auto-invest pies
- Very small starting amounts
- FX conversion cost is the real fee on US stocks
- Not available in the US
Frequently asked questions
Pepperstone or Trading 212 — which is better for US stocks?
Trading 212 gives you the actual share; Pepperstone gives leveraged exposure to the price without ownership. That is not a preference — it is a different product, with different tax, dividend and risk treatment. Pepperstone: non-US residents trading US shares as CFDs. Trading 212: european investors.
Which is cheaper?
Pepperstone: US share CFDs are commission-based on the Razor account and spread-based on Standard; overnight financing applies to positions held past the close. Trading 212: No commission on real stock investing; an FX conversion fee applies to non-base-currency trades. Both figures are restated from each broker's own pricing page; for small non-USD accounts, currency conversion usually costs more than commission does.
Which is better regulated?
Pepperstone is authorised by FCA, ASIC, CySEC, DFSA, BaFin; Trading 212 by FCA, CySEC. What matters is which entity holds your account, since that determines your compensation scheme and leverage limits.
Reviewed August 2026. Figures restated from each broker's published pages.